Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite

Language selection

Search PowderGuide

safety topics

Thoughts on the death of Tof Henry

Hero worship, risk management in Chamonix, social media and what it does to us

by Lars Oelmann 10/18/2023
Tof Henry, freeride pro from Chamonix, and Chilean mountain guide Juan Señoret died on 11 October while climbing the Puntiagudo volcano in Chile. Henry was known for his spectacular ascents of the classic and less classic steep faces around Chamonix. He brought the "freeride style" to the ice walls and made big turns at high speed where others jumped over. Tof Henry was 38 years old and is survived by his son.

Downdays has compiled further information on the accident - as far as it is known. There is a somewhat older portrait of Tof Henry by Powder. In his film "Born in Chamonix", he himself has his say and lets his descents speak for themselves.

How does the ski media react appropriately to the death of (prominent) freeriders? We've often discussed this in the PowderGuide team, and this time is no exception. Lars Oelmann, the PG PowderAlert oracle, has - like many of us - observed how the news of Tof Henry's death has spread from Insta-Story to Insta-Story. Sad little hearts accompanied the posts. The videos of Tof's steep wall ascents were often commented on with fire emojis. Lars feels that neither does justice to the situation - the hearts don't do justice to the tragic death of a person, the flames don't do justice to the descents, which were often perceived as "hard at the limit" even in the risk-tolerant freeride scene. Lars shares his thoughts in the following article.

What the "right" reaction to the death of a ski star like Tof Henry looks like and whether there is one at all, we don't know. The PG team agreed that Lars gave us some important food for thought. There were different opinions on the question of whether this kind of discussion is "appropriate" in a medium like PG so soon after an accident. We also found the resulting discussions valuable and ultimately decided to share the text here with the PG community.

Tof's death has triggered something in me that seems to be different from what it has triggered in others, at least if social media is to be believed. It has triggered in me a desire to talk about something that I have been carrying around with me for a few years and which I would now like to put up for discussion in a debate post. I emphasise that this is my opinion and not the general opinion of PowderGuide. Maybe not even anyone else's.

It's about how Tof was perceived, how we make decisions in the mountains and how we then communicate these decisions to the outside world. Tof's death is tragic. First and foremost for his family and friends, but apparently also for hundreds of others who are expressing this on social media in the form of hearts and other emojis. Many apparently find his death not only tragic, but also surprising. 

I seem to be out of line here, because my first thought was: "Not again". Because I wasn't surprised. I thought of an article from Powder Magazine about Andreas Fransson, Dave Rosenbarger and others who were portrayed as the new generation of freeriders in Chamonix at the time. They skied lines at the limit, but with a freeride attitude and not in the classic steep wall style. This means that instead of controlled jumpturns, wide turns were now skied at high speed on extremely steep and exposed slopes. The whole thing only works in good, powdery snow conditions, where the risk of avalanches tends to be significantly higher than in spring firn conditions. Tof Henry is also part of this tradition.

Almost all of the protagonists from this article are now dead. And now Tof, who grew up in Chamonix and epitomised this "Chamonix attitude" like no other, is also dead.

For me, the "Chamonix Attitude" consists on the one hand of rationalising decisions that should not have been made according to classic risk management - for example in the sense of the reduction method - and on the other hand of the way in which the "scene", to which we all belong, perceives this.

And now it gets tricky, because I'm not really interested in individual decisions or the people who make them. Rather, it's about us, about the scene that perceives and comments on the whole thing, and about our honesty towards ourselves.

safety topics
presented by

Because, let's be honest, we've almost all made decisions that we shouldn't have made after Munter, sometimes consciously, sometimes unconsciously. Everyone who wants to ride powder in exciting terrain is faced with the fact that you can no longer reduce it completely after Munter. And sooner or later, almost all of them will ride it anyway. And I think that's okay. It's not about "wrong" decisions all together, but about how you deal with them. Even if nothing usually happens, you should be aware that it was dangerous and something could have happened. You should be honest with yourself.

For many who live at the limit, pushing the boundaries is rationalised by the so-called "Chamonix attitude": "They are incredibly good at what they do. They have a lot of experience. They've done it many times. They know their stuff." And so on. Some of us might rationalise it this way so that we can continue to follow our heroes on social media. At some point, I was no longer able to do this. I could no longer watch Tof Henry's videos because I wasn't convinced that he, or more importantly many of his viewers, knew how much the whole thing was at the limit. In my opinion, they were and are not honest with themselves.

Now many on social media are talking about being surprised and thrown off track that the accumulated risk has caught up with Tof. But why am I writing a long essay? Me of all people, the powder oracle, who also contributes to the fact that people go skiing when there's lots of fresh snow?

It bothers me that the social media image and also making money is too often based on living on the edge, but that nobody makes the honest decision to live with the consequences. I'm not talking about Tof and others in his league. They have certainly made this decision for themselves. Many people follow similar lines even without social media reach, or especially not for social media reach, at least I hope so.

I mean us. We have to live with the fact that it can hit people at the limit. And nobody seems to want to admit that, because it reminds us that it can happen to us too. Almost everyone who has been travelling in the mountains long enough knows someone, at least fleetingly, who has never come back.

And now we are faced with the question of what happens when you have landed in this niche and earn money with this image, or at least companies and sponsors earn money with it. Isn't it hypocritical or even hypocritical if the industry doesn't clearly say: the risk is too high, it could be over at any time?

No. Neither from the companies nor from social media. At most from us, because advertising and companies naturally only use positive things to sell their products, and we decide what works. Perhaps modern marketing is partly to blame. But that's a different discussion. It's about making choices and living with those choices and their consequences. Tof with his, we with Tof's if we follow him, and we with ours.

Many people have always died in alpinism, skiing and high-altitude mountaineering, even without sponsorship and Instagram. But social media fuels our hero worship and categorically ignores the dark side, because it doesn't bring any clicks or likes.

Does only this blatant content work? Cody Townsend and his The Fifty Project show: No. A different approach can also work in times of social media algorithms. Should others be allowed to continue earning money by living on the edge? Absolutely. It's their decision. But they and we have to be able to live with the consequences and not just think about it when it's too late.

At the end of the day, we're all adults and we who spend a lot of time travelling in the mountains know what can happen when you push yourself to the limit. If you don't know that, you shouldn't go into the mountains, or follow people on Instagram who go into the mountains. 

But, despite the tragedy, please don't post heart emojis and act as if it was an unforeseeable misfortune. Be honest with yourselves.

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

safety topics
presented by