Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite

Language selection

Search PowderGuide

SnowFlurry

SnowFlurry 5 2018/19 | Background information on the Euregio Avalanche Report from Tyrol, South Tyrol & Trentino

Interview with project supervisor Norbert Lanzanasto and Christoph Mitterer

by Lukas Ruetz 12/25/2018
Since the 2018/19 season, there has been a joint avalanche forecast for the Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino European region for the first time. Cross-border, multilingual, standardized. A worldwide novelty. In the background, several years were spent working on the perfect implementation. We spoke to the two tireless project supervisors Norbert Lanzanasto and Christoph Mitterer from the Tyrol Avalanche Warning Service about the background to the Euregio Avalanche Report.

Last November, the three provincial governors officially launched the Euregio Avalanche Report website. This bundles all avalanche information from the affected regions and displays it on one website. How did the joint avalanche forecast of Tyrol, South Tyrol and Trentino come about?

The starting point for this project was laid some time ago. With the first presidency of Tyrol within the European Region Tyrol - South Tyrol - Trentino, ideas for joint projects were sought. Rudi Mair, head of the Tyrolean avalanche warning service, had already put forward the idea of a joint avalanche situation report to the Tyrolean governor and thus got the ball rolling. After some time, Norbert then wrote a funding application with the help of Matthias Fink, who represents the European region of Tyrol - South Tyrol - Trentino in the province of Tyrol, and successfully got it through. The starting point for the development of the joint avalanche forecast was set. With many ideas, workshops and many intensive technical discussions, a concept emerged that on the one hand followed European standards and guidelines in avalanche warning, but also placed great value on a certain general validity and scalability. This gave us a theoretical framework that we could always fall back on during practical implementation.

Who was involved in the Euregio Avalanche Report project?

The project group is quite large and comprises between 15 and 20 people. The hardcore operative project group consists of the two of us and our colleague Alex Boninsegna in Bolzano. The project is administratively supported by the European Region Tyrol - South Tyrol - Trentino. The avalanche warning services of the three countries and the University of Vienna with the Institute for Geography and Regional Research were also involved. We were also able to work with many interesting partners from science and development as well as innovative companies. The range of partners extended from weather services and snow research institutes to web design and interpreting and translation agencies. This meant that we had a large number of players, but we were also often lucky enough to have specialists in a wide range of areas, which increased the quality of the project.

SnowFlurry
presented by

A project like this is a mammoth task in the background. Just getting all the stakeholders with their different views and different languages around the table and making decisions together. What were the biggest hurdles and which moments were the highlights for you during implementation?

You're right: the detailed work and communication in the background were sometimes very intensive. However, we have to admit that the technical issues were never a problem, especially between the avalanche warning teams. As we were able to work together with many extremely experienced warning officers and snow and avalanches behave in the same way everywhere, the problems and their possible solutions were often very clear. Decisions were almost always made unanimously. Things that caused us problems often had their origins in administration, questions of taste or sensitivities - which is to be expected when so many people with experience and responsibility sit around a table. However, we were always able to resolve everything well without putting too much strain on the willingness of all those involved to compromise. The governor of South Tyrol actually put it in a nutshell: "In the end, everyone saw that the Euregio Avalanche Report represents increased value for all three countries."

How long was the Euregio Avalanche Report - known internally as "Project Albina" - fine-tuned?

The project application phase, which was largely handled by Norbert, lasted around a year. The real starting signal for the project was given on February 1, 2017. Since then, the two of us, Alex Boninsegna and many others have been working on the project. The project will come to an end at the end of July 2019. The Euregio Avalanche Report will then move into a "real" operational phase.

In principle, it seems more obvious to standardize avalanche warnings within Austria first. Why do we still find such big differences in the avalanche warning products in different regions of Austria or Italy, but not across borders?

With such a large project and the national policy behind it, a certain commitment of the three warning services was necessary - and that ultimately led to the goal. The differences between the various countries and regions have different causes. These can be of a technical, content-related or even taste-related nature. The standards and best practices of the EAWS (Association of European Avalanche Warning Services), which were deliberately formulated somewhat more freely, are also not entirely innocent. We simply think it's important that the user gets the best result - our Euregio avalanche report is also based on this.

Avalanche reports are currently usually referred to as "avalanche reports", "LLBs" or "situation reports" or "bulletins" in Switzerland. What do you think is the most appropriate name for this product? Could "I'm looking at the 'avalanche report'" become the new standard phrase?

Avalanche report definitely has potential and we think it could become established as it simply works very well in many languages. But that will probably be up to the users.

In future, the main product of the avalanche warning in the Euregio will be more of an evening forecast for the coming day, not just a recording of the current state of the snowpack. Why?

The avalanche forecast or avalanche situation report is a regional assessment and description of the avalanche danger. As such, it is used for tour planning, not to mention the planning of local avalanche commissions in the event of a disaster. And planning is simply half the battle in the winter mountains, because it should actually define the goals. So the earlier I can plan with high quality, the better I can adapt my tour destination to suit the conditions. It's also much more relaxed to plan in the evening over a glass of wine than in the morning between a hasty muesli, cappuccino and packing the backpack.

Norbert, as a computer scientist, you were responsible for the technical implementation. What are the achievements in terms of user-friendliness, intuitive access to information and handling of the new website?

We were able to break new ground in two areas during implementation. For the forecasters, the system offers the opportunity to see their colleagues' assessments while they are still writing the avalanche forecast, to exchange information and, if necessary, to jointly assess regions.

The information on the avalanche situation is then communicated on the website, and only this information. That's why we were able to build a customized homepage for the avalanche warning and tailor everything precisely to it. The European region is divided into regions, depending on the snow and weather situation. And for each of these regions there is a complete avalanche forecast, from the danger level to the snowpack structure. Every ski tourer can now choose the region that interests them and only receive the information relevant to that region.

A lot has changed with the new Euregio Avalanche Report. This means a big change for the warnings, but also for all readers. If you're used to the old site, you'll certainly have to get used to the new one, but it's worth it.

Christoph, your part as a snow researcher was the scientific aspects. How does avalanche.report address the latest findings in snow avalanche science? In what ways should we adapt our usual way of thinking in terms of risk management in the snow as a result?

In principle, I don't see myself as a purist snow researcher. I'm a little too far removed from hardcore basic research in this field for that. However, I still have a good overview of the new findings and try to bring them into the entire Euregio warning team as a multiplier. This doesn't just concern the fracture mechanics of dry or wet snow, but also aspects of forecasting and decision-making from expert knowledge in general.

In terms of risk management, I take a cherry-picking approach and like to help myself to the best and tastiest from a wide selection. My personal approach is: assess the risk for several possible tour destinations in a region based on the avalanche problem and the danger level, then check on site whether I can find the avalanche problem or the warnings from the danger assessment and the snowpack section in the terrain. And then simply use the terrain as cleverly as possible: stay below 30 degrees on the ascent, avoid terrain traps, only ski steep sections one at a time, identify safe stopping points.

SnowFlurry
presented by

Do you both already know what could/should be improved for the Euregio Avalanche Report in the future?

A lot, of course! A project like this is not like a piece of furniture that is then finished at some point. It's more like a living being - it continues to grow and develop. We won't tell you exactly what still needs to be improved, because we don't want to take the fun out of exploring. See for yourself how the thing grows.

We hope that this was just the first step towards further standardizing avalanche warnings in the Alps in terms of user-friendliness. Are there already new ideas on how to get one step closer to this goal?

We think that there are two sides that are constantly improving: On the one hand, there is the technical content of the avalanche warning. The understanding of the process, the forecast and assessment will simply improve with increasing knowledge. In addition, avalanche warnings are becoming better and better trained and more standardized - which is still not the case today, as there is no apprenticeship or course of study to become a trained avalanche warner.

On the other hand, the communication of this technical content will continue to improve. The aim is simply to offer an avalanche warning that is of the highest technical standard and has a high hit rate, while at the same time being devoured and understood by readers like a thrilling bestseller thriller.

Is it conceivable that the Euregio Avalanche Report will be extended to other regions?

In principle, yes, as it was the ambition of both of us in this project to develop something that is based on generally applicable guidelines and that is theoretically scalable in any direction. We are happy to invite other warning services, but we are not imposing ourselves in any way. On the contrary: we'll be happy if we get the first winter with the three countries off to a good start.

To both of you: When you're not in the office racking your brains about improving avalanche warning products, what are your favorite types of snow in detail? By the way, the answers "powder" or "firn" do not apply to LWD employees, we want to know more precisely.

Christoph: There are probably three types of snow or snowpack structures that I favor:

(1) 50-60 cm of freshly fallen, beautiful six-armed new snow crystals with a density of 50-80 kgm-3 on a base of small round and angular, edge-rounded crystals that increase in hardness very continuously with depth. In addition, two or three friends who gasp for air after a few swings because the mixture of air and ice takes their breath away.

(2) 2-3 cm of melted shapes, but only slightly moist on a massive melted hard cap (15 cm thick) hardness 4. It doesn't matter what's underneath, the main thing is very steep.

(3) 5 cm of milled, small round crystals with a hardness of 3, dense snow underneath. My two boys in front of me, then me trying to follow them.

Norbert: What I find most fascinating is the beautifully formed deep frost. When the cup crystals live up to their name, it's always impressive that something like this can form.

So what would your perfect snow profile look like?

Christoph: In terms of hardness, my profile looks like a perfect staircase or the Stiegl beer logo, with the exception that the last step is twice as high as the others. Grain shapes from bottom to top: small angular, then small angular-edged rounded crystals. Then small round and large fresh snow crystals. Everything fart-dry and cold.

Norbert: I can go along with that, but for me the following situation comes right after that: 30 cm of crystals building up on layers of round-grained crystals that get harder and harder towards the bottom, sunshine, freezing cold and a hiss with every swing.

In the interests of further decimating the number of avalanche victims, we hope that all avalanche warning services in the Alps will be as uniform as possible and that they will continue to be gradually adapted to the needs of the user. That way you won't run out of work any time soon. We hope to hear from you two again on the subject of "more intensive cooperation between other warning services in Europe"!

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

SnowFlurry
presented by