Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite

Language selection

Search PowderGuide

snow of tomorrow

Snow of Tomorrow | Circular Economy - More than just recycling

Circular economy and what it has to do with winter sports

by Lorenzo Rieg 12/14/2020
The circular economy has been a major trend in recent years and is sometimes referred to as sustainability 2.0. At first glance, the concept appears to be more technical and more focused on one area. And anyway, most of us have been learning about waste separation and recycling from an early age, especially in Germany, the realm of the can and bottle deposit.

So what this is really about and what it might have to do with winter sports is what we try to tackle in this article.

Circular economy

In the classic economic system, which has been prevalent since industrialization at the latest and has had a considerable influence on the world and our lives, products are generally manufactured, then used for as long as they work or are needed, and then disposed of. In this "linear economy", defective or unusable products therefore end up at the end of their life cycle either in a landfill or in an incineration plant, although in the latter case at least some energy can still be recovered.

The circular economy, on the other hand, is a regenerative system in which the use of resources, but also the production of waste and the associated emissions and energy waste, are minimized. This is achieved through products designed for minimal resource use and durability, maintenance and repair, reuse and recycling. The potential of the circular economy is huge. According to estimates, consistent implementation in the construction, transportation and food production sectors alone could save 60% of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. In terms of the material systems with the highest emissions, namely steel, aluminum, cement and plastic, savings of around a third would be possible and realistic. Of course, this only works if the circular economy is seen as a system-transforming process and is not just about finding better ways to reuse and recycle waste in the existing economic model.

Reduce - Reuse - Recycle

Contrary to popular belief, recycling is not the first choice in the circular economy. Rather, recycling should only be used when further use of products is no longer possible. On the one hand, this is due to the fact that recycling requires a relatively large amount of energy and that energy consumption increases the more of the recycled material can actually be used again. On the other hand, there is hardly any material or product that is perfectly suitable for recycling. There is therefore always a certain loss in quality and/or quantity. Of course, there are major differences between different products and materials. For example, electronic devices, which consist of countless, firmly connected parts, are more difficult to recycle than a PET bottle and aluminum - to put it simply - is more suitable for recycling than steel.

Of course, you can discuss this almost endlessly. But the most important thing here is to realize the limits of recycling. It is relatively easy to produce material for fleece jackets from carefully separated PET bottles, but very time-consuming to produce recyclate from a wide variety of packaging materials, from which technical parts with high requirements can be produced. In order to retain the value or, to put it another way, the energy and raw materials used, recycling must result in recyclates and products that are as equivalent as possible, which can then also be reused. Otherwise, this is known as "downcycling": the quality and thus the value steadily decrease.

Instead of sending products for recycling, it is much better to reduce the total quantity of products or the material required for production. This can be achieved by using materials that are as durable as possible or through appropriate design, but also through more conscious consumption or the "sharing economy", which is also becoming increasingly popular. All of this can make a decisive contribution to significantly reducing resource consumption. Somehow logical, after all, fewer cars, sweaters or skis need to be produced if they last longer or can be used by several people!

The use of natural, renewable raw materials is also becoming increasingly important. If, for example, wood is used instead of steel or bamboo instead of plastic, no irreplaceable resources are consumed. What's more, as long as the renewable raw materials are actually renewable, no embedded emissions are released.

And what about winter sports?

But if our skis break or our jacket simply can't protect us from the elements, the question arises as to what should happen to it. At least if you don't have a lot of space in your ski cellar and simply store discarded equipment permanently... Of course, it's nice if you can recycle the equipment or use it for as long as possible. Compared to other areas of our lives, winter sports equipment generally plays a relatively minor role. Nevertheless, it's great if you can contribute to reducing the consumption of resources and the emission of climate-damaging greenhouse gases through your consumption decisions.

However, you should also honestly consider what equipment you really need. Because the most environmentally friendly thing is what you don't need. Durable and long-lasting equipment is therefore quite environmentally friendly, even if it is not made from the latest, greenest material. Of course, it is also advantageous that more and more material manufacturers are making increasing efforts to produce equipment that is as sustainable as possible. These efforts range from the use of recycled or natural raw materials as raw materials to repair and take-back programs and "design for recycling". Care is taken right from the material selection and design stage to ensure that products can be recycled as easily as possible at the end of their life.

Conclusion

The circular economy is important and is currently being promoted at various levels. The effects, but also the restrictions, are far-reaching, although it must be admitted that the great potential probably does not lie in winter sports and thus in PowderGuide's core area. Of course, we also try as best we can to consider whether we really need a new pair of skis now and are pleased about the constantly growing range of equipment made from sustainable and recyclable materials as well as the efforts of the winter sports industry. Nevertheless, decisions in other areas of life, such as housing, nutrition and mobility, simply have a much greater impact on our personal ecological footprint.

For those who want to delve a little deeper into the topic, there are numerous freely available resources on the Ellen MacArthur Foundation website.

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments