Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite

Language selection

Search PowderGuide

safety topics

Practical test | White Risk app for route planning

What can the White Risk app do and how does it support you with tour planning and on the road?

by Patrick Wehowsky 03/30/2019
White Risk, the SLF's comprehensive learning/knowledge tool for avalanche prevention, has been around for several years now. While version 1.0 was still distributed via DVDs, White Risk has been web-based and interactive since 2013. The White Risk app for IOS and Android is also available so that you can use the planned tours on your smartphone. I tried out how well the whole thing actually works for you using a tour to the Seekarspitze as an example

In the meantime, there are already one or two apps that can be used for planning and orientation on ski tours. In general, it can be said that such apps are always confronted with the difficulty of achieving a good balance between usability and clarity on the one hand and the number of features on the other.

The White Risk app, so much to start with, succeeds in most aspects in an excellent way.

Tours can be planned both on the White Risk online platform (www.whiterisk.ch) and in the app. The app and online platform synchronize the tours so that all tours are available everywhere.

In fact, the planning tool is very easy to use both on the website and in the app. It is best to set up a trial account so that you can use all modules on whiterisk.ch and the White Risk app in full and without restrictions for 7 days, giving you enough time to try them out.

The function of individual aspects is illustrated in a didactically exemplary manner using short videos.

You can create different folders for tours and sort your own tours according to various criteria. Tours can be shared with other users to expand your own tour database. However, I would still like to see a visual representation of the tours on an overview map. This is possible in the app, but not yet in the website tool.

safety topics
presented by

In the following, I would like to use the example of the tour to the Seekarspitze on Lake Achensee to illustrate how the whole thing works on the computer.

During the planning...

The tour module on the website whiterisk.ch/tour is divided into the four subcategories 1. plan route, 2. assess conditions, 3. further preparations and 4. share and take along.

After selecting the country - in the first step - I end up in the central planning tool, where I can select the four subcategories at any time and jump back and forth between them.

The search function for places and peaks is fast and works well in my case, although the function in Austria is significantly less comprehensive in terms of places or hamlets than in Switzerland. This is most likely simply due to the poorer database of the underlying map material.

Various overlays can be selected in the map material. However, only the Swiss maps have many layers. Here, however, the app shines with the integration of the latest hazard maps (CAT, ATH) and is therefore at the cutting edge of research in this area. In addition to the topo maps, slope layers are also available for Austria and France.

Plotting the route is simple and intuitive. You can color-code routes, draw in alternatives, easily extend routes or adjust their course or delete individual waypoints.

My tour to the Seekarspitze on Lake Achensee first runs along a forest path before continuing in open terrain on a wooded ridge and finally a ridge to the summit.

The route is always drawn in freehand mode, which I personally like, as a selection function (e.g. on outdooractive) between freehand and using paths makes it much more fiddly and therefore less attractive to use.

The tour planning tool is suitable for all ability levels, from beginners to professionals, thanks to the always available knowledge content on the various aspects (folded in as a light bulb at the top right-hand edge of the map).

In addition, there is also the option of setting key points and evaluating these again separately in order to make an active decision during the tour.

The assessment of the key points is implemented excellently in the planning tool and in the app. Visual aids, such as the graphical reduction method, are combined with checklists of important factors for assessing the slope.

In my case, it becomes clear that the large, fairly homogeneous east-facing slope, which is 40 degrees steep in parts, generates three exclamation marks - which once again points out the generally unfavorable terrain formation. In rather mediocre conditions, you really have no business on this tour.

My second key point referred to a possible alternative descent, which is even steeper in places and possibly more at risk of falling. We actually skied the alternative on the tour, as the conditions allowed it and the main route had already been skied diligently.

The checklists in particular are suitable for beginners and pros alike. It's not for nothing that pilots use checklists for many areas, which can of course be completed all the more quickly with a great deal of knowledge.

Also well done is the time estimation of the tour, which can be adjusted again. It offers just enough options to differentiate between snowshoe tours and ski tours, for example, but doesn't get bogged down in individual points that need to be defined. This is how good software design works!

The Assess conditions tab is again great for Switzerland, but still at least good for Austria, as you can access the respective avalanche warning services via functioning links. The assessment questions show that the Swiss bulletin was used as a basis. For example, there is no option to specify an altitude-dependent avalanche warning level, which is frequently indicated by the respective warning services in Tyrol, Vorarlberg and Bavaria, but is rarely practiced in Switzerland and was therefore probably not included.

In further preparations, various planning aspects regarding the group composition, skills of the individual participants (human factor) and the comparison of the planned tour and the prevailing conditions are queried again using a checklist. This can be done very quickly with the same tour participants, but is a valuable reflection tool, especially for guided tours.

Finally, under Share and take away it is possible to send the tour as a link to other participants or to download and print a summary of the tour with a map as a PDF.

In addition, it is possible to export the tour data as a GPS track or route, as well as import existing GPS tracks and edit them.

Tour planning is also possible on the smartphone in the app and works surprisingly well on the small displays. In the current iOS version, you can use the main functions that also characterize the online planning tool on the website. I can easily set key points in the app, rate them and make additional notes on conditions and people. The app is not yet as advanced on Android, but the SLF has assured us that updates will ensure the same range of functions as on iOS.

...and on the road

On tour, the app proves to be a tidy and useful companion. The planned route is automatically synchronized and the map section is downloaded for offline use. If you use the app for navigation, it makes sense to switch on flight mode on your smartphone. This automatically uses the offline maps and requires little power. Your own location is always displayed on the map when the GPS is switched on, with the respective viewing direction shown by a field of view.

The toolbox, which can be opened from the bottom, is very well done. Here, the GPS shows us the current position as well as the altitude and the accuracy of the information. The accuracy information in particular is a significant improvement compared to the other apps in this category.

You also have the option of taking a bearing from your current location or measuring the distance between two points. Both when taking bearings and when measuring, I am also given the walking distance. I can use this march number to navigate in bad weather using a compass.

This form of the toolbox is only available in the Android version. The iOS version has a slightly different solution, although I find the Android version better in this case. (I only looked at the iOS version for comparison purposes).

Conclusion

The White-Risk app in combination with the online planning tool offers precise, theoretically profound and well-designed support for planning and carrying out tours in the field. Both the tour planning and the other modules on White Risk are didactically stringent and go hand in hand. This didactic stringency in combination with good design makes it possible for both beginners and professionals to benefit from the app.

What I would essentially like to see in the future is a quick adaptation of the Android version to the iOS app. In addition, the measuring instrument would also be helpful in the online planning tool if you want to determine marching figures for relevant routes.

Photo gallery

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

safety topics
presented by