Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite

Language selection

Search PowderGuide

gear reviews

Gear reviews | Tecnica Cochise 130

Successful revision of the freeride classic from Italy

by Lukas Zögernitz 02/13/2017
Lighter - tougher - more agile. This seems to be the credo of the hour for freeride boots. The boundaries between freetouring and downhill-oriented boots with a walking function are beginning to blur. The Italian boot specialists from Tecnica are also consistently following this trend and, with the Cochise 130, are delivering a downhill-oriented four-buckle boot that doesn't need to hide away on the ascent either.

Testers and test conditions

The boot was tested for around 20 days in the 16/17 season by an 82 kg, 182 cm tall man with a sporty skiing style. Thanks to the tech inserts and alpine sole (without the hassle of changing), it was used on a wide variety of skis with different bindings (from giant slalom skis to park and freeride skis to a powder board with Dynafit Beast 14). We skied on (icy) pistes, (unfortunately rarely) powder and various surfaces in between. Due to the time of year and temperatures, the boot was not used in slushy snow.

First impression

When you hold the bright orange boot in your hands for the first time, it's easy to recognize the character of an alpine racing boot. The narrow design, four buckles and power strap give you an idea that the Cochise's strength lies in downhill skiing. The materials and workmanship look solid. The boot is robust overall. Although the weight is not as surprising as that of full carbon touring boots, it also feels lighter than comparable models. Compared to the previous models, the tech inserts built into the shell catch the eye. With the bright yellow strap, it's more a case of chunking than spilling. The buckle and liner are noticeably adapted to the anatomy of the foot in many areas, such as the heel.

The Tecnica Zero G Guide Pro model, which was also released this season and reviewed here, differs at first glance with its significantly more purist liner and lower weight. You can find out whether the Cochise justifies the difference in weight in terms of downhill performance and how this affects the ascent in the practical section below.

Shell
The two-piece "C.A.S" shell made of lightweight "bi-material polyether" is anatomically shaped like the liner and fits perfectly with it. The shoe itself is narrow to medium with a last of 99 mm. Unfortunately, as with other Technica models, there are no wider or more voluminous versions available for riders with large (wide) feet. The four aluminum buckles screwed to the shell (= easy replacement) can be adjusted in length using the "Micro" system by simply turning them. If this is no longer sufficient, there is also a second drill hole in which the buckle can be moved. According to the manufacturer, the "Power Light Design"frame, which can be recognized by the surface structure in the rear and lower area of the shell, is 2.5 times stiffer and at the same time 30% thinner than previously installed frames, which saves weight. According to Tecnica, this is one of the reasons why the Cochise 130 is the lightest four-buckle polyether ski boot ever built. In the area where the shell overlaps in the lower part of the boot, a double slat is incorporated to prevent moisture from penetrating.

The walk function can only be recognized on the outside by a small switch (with a strap for easier operation with gloves). In the walk position, the switch releases a solid metal hook on the inside, which hooks into another metal part in the ski position. Thanks to the "S.A.S. (Self Adjusting System)", the walk function adjusts itself so that there is no play. The 45 mm wide strap is firmly attached to the shell via two screws on the back. This has the advantage that you can easily fit your own power strap if necessary.

Exchangeable soles with touring tread are available for the Cochise 130 Pro at an RRP of €49.9. As the inserts in the new model are already built into the shell, they "only" have the advantage of better grip on hikes or climbing passages with the skis on the back. On the other hand, the disadvantage with mounted touring soles is that the sliding surfaces built into the alpine soles are no longer available for correct function in alpine bindings.

gear reviews
presented by

Inner boot
Compared to many other freeride boots, the inner boot of the Cochise is of a higher quality and equipped with many features. The upper area around the shin and calf, which is almost completely covered in plastic, is particularly eye-catching. From the spoiler, which can be flexibly positioned using Velcro, plastic reinforcements extend over both sides into the tongue area. The tongue itself is made entirely of plastic at the front and is comparatively thickly padded with hard foam. This always results in a stiff, progressive flex towards the front, but it never feels too hard or is even stopped abruptly. If the Cochise doesn't fit right away, it can be adjusted by means of thermal adjustment, as is usual in this price range. A practical feature of the "C.A.S" liner is the micro-shell material, which can be used to adjust the boot both by pressing and by grinding (up to 2mm). For the ascent, there are inserts in the upper area of the Achilles tendon and on both sides of the arch of the foot to provide additional freedom of movement. The high-quality workmanship is underlined by the leather used around the heel. This increases the durability of the liner in this area. For the use of boot heaters, an inlet slot is integrated here through which the cabling can be pulled in.

Test

The coordinated shape of the shell and liner, based on the anatomy of the foot, as well as the practical bootfitting features (C.A.S liner) enable a very good fit. Among other things, the heel hold is excellent. In (very) cold temperatures, the shell becomes rock hard and can trigger the odd swear word while preparing for the tour in the parking lot. The somewhat narrow tongue of the inner shoe can then, if not one hundred percent in the right place, sometimes press uncomfortably. The thermal adjustment of the inner boot provides some relief here.

On the ascent
The shaft rotation of 42° is fine for a clearly downhill-oriented touring ski boot. The difference to touring boots with a rotation angle of over 70° is noticeable, but with open buckles (there is an extra hook for the ascent - see photos) and a very loose strap, you can still help a little and achieve a satisfactory result. Only when the upper shell rotates backwards when the ski is pushed forward flat (e.g. when taking big steps) does the strongly pronounced shell soon stop the movement in the area of the Achilles tendon. You then have the feeling that you are trying to bend the Achilles tendon over an edge. The movements of the shell and inner boot on the ascent are fluid and no parts get in the way or rub against each other. In combination with a pin binding, the Cochise slows down ambitions for long tours significantly less than previous freeride boots with an ascent function. Even with medium fitness levels, tours up to over 1000 m are realistic and the ski boot is no longer very suitable as an excuse for missed fitness sessions in summer.

On the descent
When the buckles on the Cochise are closed and the walking mechanism is in ski mode, the Tecnica boot really comes into its own. Flex and downhill performance are almost indistinguishable from an alpine boot. The flex specified by the manufacturer as 130 (but there is no standard here!) is hard, but you never have the feeling of "standing in line". While some freeriders with a comparable flex rating were still quite soft in some areas or had play in the walking function, the Cochise delivers the outstanding downhill performance that the manufacturer promises. The boot is then quickly no longer the weakest link in the chain (in the case of the tester - with appropriate skis - this is clearly the thighs again...). As with all boots, the flex depends on the temperature, but even after a night in a warm room you have to make an effort to push the boot all the way through. The powerstrap naturally has an influence on the flex, but this can be adjusted very well. All in all, the Cochise fits perfectly on the descent and nothing wobbles or has air in it.

Conclusion

Even if Tecnica hasn't quite found the jack-of-all-trades of freeride boots with the new Cochise 130 Pro, they've made good progress on the way there. The experience gained in racing is clearly visible in the downhill performance. So if you can accept a few small compromises in terms of shaft rotation and weight on the ascent, the Cochise should be at the top of your list when choosing your freeride boot. It's just a shame that it will probably be a little too narrow for freeriders with a very wide foot.

Advantages & disadvantages

+ Very good downhill performance
+ Fit and adjustment options
+ Workmanship
- Only available as a "narrow" version with 99mm last
- Compared to "pure" touring boots, weight and shaft rotation on the ascent

Details

  • Last width 99 millimetres

  • Weight 2000 g/pc. (manufacturer's specification for size 26.5), 2290 g/pc. (measured for size 28.5)

  • Flex 130

  • Size 22.0 - 31.0

  • Sole: ISO 5355 with low tech rubber toe & heel

  • RRP € 549


Here is the link to Tecnica's website with more information.

This product was provided to PowderGuide free of charge by the manufacturer for testing. How we test it can be found in our test statement.

Photo gallery

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

gear reviews
presented by